About Authors:
Mr. Rajat Kumar Pandeya
M. Pharm., Dept. of Pharmaceutics,
Noida Institute of Engg. & Technology
Greater Noida, India.
rajatkumar.pandeya@gmail.com
ABSTRACT :
Oral disintegrating tablets (ODTs) have received ever-increasing demand during the last decade, and the field has become a rapidly growing area in the pharmaceutical industry. Upon introduction into the mouth, these tablets dissolve or disintegrate in the mouth in the absence of additional water for easy administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients. The popularity and usefulness of the formulation resulted in development of several ODT technologies. This review describes various formulations and technologies developed to achieve fast dissolution/dispersion of tablets in the oral cavity. In particular, this review describes in detail FDT technologies based on lyophilization, molding, sublimation, and compaction, as well as approaches to enhancing the ODT properties, such as spraydrying, moisture treatment, sintering, and use of sugar-based disintegrants. In addition, taste-masking technologies, experimental measurements of disintegration times, and clinical studies are also discussed.
Reference Id: PHARMATUTOR-ART-1421
INTRODUCTION
Gastroesophageal reflux disease or GERD occurs when the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) does not close properly and stomach contents leak back, or reflux, into the esophagus. The LES is a ring of muscle at the bottom of the esophagus that acts like a value between the esophagus and stomach. The esophagus carries food from the mouth to the stomach.
When refluxed stomach acid touches the lining of the esophagus, it causes a burning sensation in the chest or throat called heartburns. The fluid may even be tested in the back of the mouth, and this is called acid indigestion. Occasional heartburn is common but does not necessarily mean one has GERD. Heartburn that occurs more than twice a week may be considered GERD, and it can eventually lead to more serious health problems.
Anyone, including infants, children and pregnant women, can have GERD. Lansoprazole is one of the classes of proton pump inhibitors, which reduce gastric acidity, an important factor in healing acid-related disorders such as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. It is used to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, ulcers, acid-related dyspepsia and as an adjuvant in the eradication of H. pylori.2,3,4
Granules are of great interest to the pharmaceutical industry for variety of reasons. Pelletized products not only offer flexibility in dosage form design and development, but are also utilized to improve safety and efficacy of bioactive agents. The focal intent of the present cram was to develop a stable, pharmaceutically equivalent, robust and delayed release micro pellet formulation of Lansoprazole.
MATERIALS AND METHODS MATERIALS
Lansoprazole was obtained as gift sample from Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient, Sugar Granules, MCC , HPC and Mg Carbonate from Alkem Research Centre.
METHODS
Preparation of Lansoprazole microGranules
The prototype microGranules of lansoprazole were prepared using MCC Sphere to optimize the various parameters such as inlet temperature, outlet temperature and air pressure of Fluid Bed Coater. Then formulations of delayed release microGranules of lansoprazole were done using HPC as a release retardant in different concentrations (table 1).
Drug Loading
MCC Spheres were sieved through 30#40 and 33% of Granules was taken for drug loading from total batch size. Required quantity of drug was taken and dispersed in specified ml of purified water solution and stirred for 10 minutes. The required quantity of MCC Spheres was taken and dispersed in specified ml of purified water and stirred for 10 minutes to obtain a clear solution. Purified water Solution was mixed with dispersed MCC Sphere solution with stirring. Granules were loaded using dispersion both in to FBC bowl and coated.
Barrier coating
Required quantity of Drug loaded Granules was taken for Barrier coating. Required quantity of HPMC was taken and dissolved in specified ml of purified water and stirred until a clear solution was obtained and coating was done (table 2).
Enteric coating
Specified quantity of Barrier coated Granules were taken for Enteric coating. Required quantity of Eudragit L30 D55, Talc, Titanium Dioxide, Iron oxide Red and citric acid (Table 2)were taken and dispersed in specified ml of purified water and stirred for 10 minutes to obtain a clear solution. The prepared dispersion was mixed with Eudragit solutions with required quantity of Water solution for pH adjustment and coating was done.
Evaluation of powder blend and Granules
The formulated powder blend were evaluated for compatibility, particle size shape analysis using Malvern particlesizer (MS 2000)5, angle repose6, hausner’s ratio, compressibility index, bulk density, true density and Granule density5, flow rate, Carr’s Index.
Compression of Tablets
The prepared blend was compressed in round shaped tablet 20mg . The weight of tablet 140-160mg , Hardness 60-80N , thickness 2.50-2.60mm and DT is 2-4 min.
In-vitro Dissolution studies
The release of drug from the developed formulations in the environment of gastrointestinal tract was determined using the USP XXIII dissolution apparatus II (Electro lab TDT – 08L). Tablets equivalent to 20 mg of Lansoprazole in beaker containing 900 ml of 0.1N HCl of dissolution media maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C and 100 rpm. After 1 hour the medium was drained without losing the Granules and 900 ml of pre heated buffer solution of pH 6.8 added, study was further continued for 60 minutes at 75 rpm. Aliquot of samples were withdrawn at every 15 minutes each time which was replaced by the same amount of fresh medium.
The samples were Centrifuge at 5000 rpm for 5 minutes of the above solution, and clear supernatant liquid was used. Correction factors for each aliquot were considered in calculation of release profile. Absorbance of sample after proper dilution was measured at 285 nm using HPLC Dionex (chromeleon) against blank. Concentration of drug was determined from the standard plots of the drug in buffer and the percentage drug release was calculated at each sampling time.
NOW YOU CAN ALSO PUBLISH YOUR ARTICLE ONLINE.
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE/PROJECT AT articles@pharmatutor.org
Subscribe to PharmaTutor Alerts by Email
FIND OUT MORE ARTICLES AT OUR DATABASE
Dissolution profile Comparisons (Using a Similarity Factor)
A simple model independent approach uses a difference factor (f1) and a similarity factor (f2) to compare dissolution profiles. The difference factor (f1) calculates the percent (%) difference between the two curves at each point and is a measurement to the relative error between the two curves:
f1= {[∑n=1 n?Rt – Tt ?]/ [∑t=1 n Rt ]}*100
Where n is the number of time point, Rt is the dissolution
value of the reference batch at time t, and Tt is the dissolution value of the test batch at time t.
The similarity factor (f2) is the logarithmic reciprocal square root transformation of the sum of squared error and is a measurement of the similarity in the percent (%) dissolution between the two curves.
f2 = 50 • log {[1+ ( 1/n) ∑t=1n ( Rt – Tt )2 ]-0.5•100}
For the curves to be considered similar, f1 values should be close to 0, and f2 values should be close to 100.
Generally, f1 values up to (0-15) and f2 values greater than 50 (50-100) ensures sameness or equivalence of the two curves and thus, of the performance of the test and reference products. The comparative dissolution was performed using Lanzol 20mg7.
Gasric Resistance Study
The release of drug from the developed formulations in the environment of gastrointestinal tract was determined using the USP XXIII dissolution apparatus II (Electro lab TDT – 08L). Capsules containing micro Granules equivalent to 30 mg of Lansoprazole in beaker containing 900ml 0.1 HCl N of dissolution media maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C and 75 rpm. After 1 hour the medium was drained without losing the Granules transfer it to a filter paper and dry the Granules by blotting with filter paper. Granules were transferred into 100 ml volumetric flask, 40ml of 0.1M NaOH was added and sonicator to dissolve. Further it was diluted up to 100 ml with 0.1M NaOH. About 15 ml of solution was centrifuged for 5 minutes. 5 ml of the clear supernatant liquid was diluted to 50 ml with mobile phase. Absorbance of sample after proper dilution was measured at 285 nm using HPLC Dionex (chromeleon) against blank.
Drug Content
Equivalent weights to equivalent to 20mg of Lansoprazole into a dry 100 ml volumetric flask added about 50 ml of 0.1 M NaOH and sonicate to dissolve. The volume was make up to the mark with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide and mix. 20 to 30 ml of solution was transferred into dry stoppered test-tube and it was centrifuge at 5000rpm for 5 minutes. Samples were analyzed using HPLC Dionex (chromeleon) at a wavelength of 285nm. The drug content was determined by diluting 5 ml of the supernatant solution to 50ml with mobile phase.
Accelerated stability studies
Formulation were stored at various temperature viz. 25°C/60% RH, 30°C/65% RH and 40°C/75% RH as per ICH guidelines and various physicochemical parameter (appearance, percentage drug content and release profile) were monitored periodically for 3 months8.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Lansoprazole DR ODT was formulated, using HPMC as release retardant in various concentration with an enteric coating. Lansoprazole micro Granules were prepared by applying optimized pressure and temperature in fluid bed coater technique. Lansoprazole meets all the ideal characteristics to formulate in the form of oral drug delivery system.
Under Preformulation study, FTIR analysis between the drug and enteric polymer mixture showed no unaccountable extra peaks, which confirms the absence of chemical interaction between the drug and polymer.
Physical characterization
Powder blend of Lansoprazole and micro Granules were evaluated for various physiochemical parameters.
The organoleptic properties were complied with the British Pharmacopeia specification. Physical properties such as particle size analysis, bulk density of raw material powder, Melting point. Solution properties solubility evaluated, results were complied with the pharmacopeia specification. Loss on drying was within the British Pharmacopeia limit and the result of angle of repose of powder showed the poor flow properties. Angle of repose and flow rates of the different formulations were compared with bulk drug, Lansoprazole, which shows that after Granules formulation flow properties and flow rate were excellent. Assay of Lansoprazole was carried out using HPLC and it was found to be 99.6% (figure 5). Technological characterizations of formulated Lansoprazole powder blend and microGranules formulation are shown in (table 3).
In Vitro Dissolution Studies
The dissolution rate studies for each of the formulations were performed in order to assess the effect of increase in surfactant concentration on release profile. In dissolution studies, 900ml solution of 0.1N HCl was taken for one hour and followed by 900ml phosphate buffer pH 6.8 to mimic the cumulative release of drug in stomach. Result of in vitro dissolution rate studies are shown in (table 4) (figure 1).
Dissolution profile Comparisons (Similarity Factor)
The dissolution comparisons by model independent approach using a similarity factor f1 is found to be 2.18 and f2 found 86.53 (table 5) (figure2).
Gastric Resistance study
Acid resistances study shows that the optimized formulation F9 is more stable in the acidic media i.e.
99.36% of drug was released in 60 minutes. Result of acid resistances studies are correlated in (table 4) (figure3).
Accelerated stability studies
The selected formulations were subjected for accelerated stability studies as per the ICH guidelines.
There were no changes in appearances and percentage drug content of Granules stored at different temperature for drug remaining vs. time at 25°C/60% RH, 30°C/65% RH and 40°C/75% RH. All the parameter were within the limit after 90 days.
CONCLUSION
The study was undertaken with an aim to develop delayed release micro pellet dosage form for Lansoprazole, which is a benzimidazole anti ulcer agent and is one of the most widely used drug for treating mild and severe ulcers.
Based on the Drug-Excipient compatibility data and prototype formulations, the formula that found to be giving the desired drug release pattern was considered as the optimized formulation and further studies were conducted on this formulation F9 to have a detailed study over that formulation. By the observations made, it was concluded that the formulation F9 shows delayed release profile and it was within the USP limits, and also this formulation done by FBC process which is a sophisticated method.
Then this formulation was compared with marketed product by an in vitro study, which definitely improves patient’s compliances and reduces the gastric side effects.
Table 1. Formulation of Lansoprazole pellets
Ingredients(inpercent) |
Formulation code |
|||||||||||
Proto type |
Formulation with HPMC |
|||||||||||
|
FP1 |
FP2 |
FP3 |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
Lansoprazole%basedonbatchsize |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
PVPK30tothedrug |
40 |
50 |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
HPMCE-5tothedrug |
- |
- |
- |
40 |
40 |
40 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
NaOHtothedrug |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
Sugarspheres(30#40)tothebatchsize |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
D.M.Water |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Qs. |
Table 2.Technological characterization of coating formula on optimized formulation F9
Prototypeformulationwith HPC |
FormulationwithHPMC |
||
Barriercoating formula |
|||
Ingredients |
Qty. |
Ingredients |
Qty. |
HPMC |
12 %ofdrugloaded |
HPMCE5 |
12%of drugloaded |
Purifiedwater |
12%×16Portion |
Purifiedwater |
12%×16Portion |
Entericcoatingformula |
|||
Eudragit |
60%of |
EudragitSolution |
60%of |
Talc |
5%of |
Talc |
5%of |
TitaniumDioxide |
2%of |
TitaniumDioxide |
2%of |
HPC |
3.6%of |
HPC |
3.6%of |
Tween80 |
0.5%of |
Tween80 |
0.5%ofEudragitsolution |
PEG |
0.2%of |
SodiumHydroxide |
0.2%ofEudragitsolution |
PurifiedWater |
Equalto |
PurifiedWater |
EqualtoEudragitsolution. |
NOW YOU CAN ALSO PUBLISH YOUR ARTICLE ONLINE.
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE/PROJECT AT articles@pharmatutor.org
Subscribe to PharmaTutor Alerts by Email
FIND OUT MORE ARTICLES AT OUR DATABASE
Table 3. Technological characterization of formulated Lansoprazole powder blend and microGranules formulation*
Parameters |
Lansoprazole |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
Angleofrepose* |
39.11±0.65 |
24.23±0.02 |
24.48±0.04 |
25.06±1.06 |
23.93±0.19 |
25.18±0.33 |
25.14±0.14 |
25.92±0.14 |
24.72±0.15 |
23.31±0.04 |
Flowrategm/sec* |
- |
8.2±0.24 |
7.9±0.19 |
8.7±0.11 |
6.7±0.27 |
8.4±0.32 |
8.4±0.29 |
9.1±0.17 |
8.7±0.11 |
7.7±0.28 |
Hausner’sratio |
1.43 |
1.07 |
1.07 |
1.07 |
1.06 |
1.04 |
1.04 |
1.08 |
1.04 |
1.05 |
Carr’sIndex |
- |
5.47 |
5.71 |
4.38 |
4.96 |
5.21 |
5.47 |
5.39 |
5.11 |
4.96 |
Bulkdensity |
0.4065±0.02 |
0.923±0.01 |
0.937±0.01 |
0.921±0.03 |
0.934±0.01 |
0.915±0.01 |
0.952±0.03 |
0.947±0.01 |
0.928±0.04 |
0.938±0.06 |
Tapped density |
0.5813±0.03 |
0.989±0.01 |
1.004±0.01 |
0.988±0.04 |
0.991±0.02 |
0.959±0.03 |
0.999±0.06 |
1.028±0.01 |
0.972±0.03 |
0.987±0.05 |
Granulesdensity* |
- |
1.93±0.04 |
2.01±0.02 |
1.97±0.08 |
2.08±0.03 |
2.00±0.05 |
1.87±0.03 |
2.29±0.02 |
2.05±0.01 |
1.97±0.02 |
Lossondrying |
0.19 |
2.16 |
2.36 |
2.86 |
2.71 |
2.05 |
2.36 |
2.03 |
2.48 |
2.61 |
Friability% |
- |
0.07 |
0.125 |
0.21 |
0.114 |
0.087 |
0.089 |
0.075 |
0.097 |
0.084 |
Assay(%) |
99.97 |
84.07 |
84.27 |
85.15 |
90.62 |
86.01 |
91.72 |
96.15 |
98.47 |
99.86 |
Table 4. In vitro Release Profile of Percentage Cumulative Drug Release from various formulations and Acid Resistance Dissolution Data*
Timein minutes |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
DissolutionprofileofLansoprazole20mgcapsules |
|||||||||
0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
15 |
45.74±0.55 |
48.35±1.06 |
50.32±1.10 |
53.07±1.57 |
56.28±0.91 |
54.69±0.25 |
58.65±0.11 |
62.87±0.64 |
63.92±1.49 |
30 |
58.36±0.22 |
52.87±1.12 |
55.18±1.81 |
62.81±0.67 |
64.16±1.15 |
67.48±0.93 |
64.87±1.57 |
71.86±0.46 |
76.43±0.57 |
45 |
66.54±0.26 |
68.74±0.69 |
65.67±0.58 |
68.49±1.81 |
71.33±1.08 |
73.61±0.81 |
75.46±0.61 |
78.26±0.74 |
83.88±1.61 |
60 |
72.18±1.08 |
73.28±1.62 |
75.48±1.88 |
77.52±1.20 |
79.65±1.23 |
77.21±0.23 |
81.52±1.07 |
85.68±0.61 |
89.24±1.99 |
AcidResistanceDissolutionData |
|||||||||
0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
60 |
89.68±0.55 |
87.48±1.81 |
88.25±0.90 |
92.33±0.69 |
87.68±1.02 |
91.25±1.50 |
95.56±1.05 |
97.00±0.85 |
99.37±1.25 |
Table 5. Comparative Dissolution Profile of F9 with Reference
Time in minutes |
F–9 |
Reference(Lanzol20mg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
63.92±1.49 |
62.14±1.01 |
30 |
76.43±0.57 |
74.27±0.96 |
45 |
83.88±1.61 |
83.27±1.10 |
60 |
89.24±1.99 |
87.98±0.99 |
REFERENCES
1. Ghebre-Sellassie I., In Pharmaceutical Pellitization Technology (Ghebre–Sellassie), Marcel Dekker, Ist ed. 1989, 1-13.
2. rug data sheet.com
3. Tetsunori Hasebe et. al., Tokai J. Exp. Clinical Med., 1998, l(23), 177-182.
4. Sean R. Tunis et. al., Clinical Theraputics, 1997, 19, 4.
5. Subramanyam C.V.S., Text Book of Pharmaceutics, New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan, 2nd ed. 198-200, 223-224.
6. Sinha V.R, Agrawal M.K., and Kumria R., Influence of formulation and excipient variables on the pellet properties prepared by extrusion spheronization, C. Drug Del., 2005, 5, 1-8.
7. Moore, Statistical Design and Analysis of Stability Studies, Published by CRC Press., 2007, 330.
8. Paulo Costa. And Jose Manuel Sausalobe., Modeling and compression of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2001, 13, 123-133.
NOW YOU CAN ALSO PUBLISH YOUR ARTICLE ONLINE.
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE/PROJECT AT articles@pharmatutor.org
Subscribe to PharmaTutor Alerts by Email
FIND OUT MORE ARTICLES AT OUR DATABASE